Let this serve as a public record:
One of the largest social media companies in the world has now permanently removed a page that actively contributed to the ongoing defamation, harassment, and reputational harm I’ve spent months documenting.
And they didn’t do it voluntarily.
They didn’t do it through their support channels.
They didn’t do it when it was reported.
They only did it after receiving legal notices backed by structured evidence.
And when they took it down, they confirmed why.
It wasn’t policy.
It wasn’t moderation.
It was because someone — me — filed.
And they knew the evidence couldn’t be ignored.
🧾 Why This Matters
The page in question wasn’t just hostile.
It was defamatory.
It was part of a campaign of falsehoods, reputation sabotage, and coordinated abuse —
published, hosted, and repeated despite formal reports and appeals.
They left it live until the pressure became real.
Until documentation landed.
Until someone with no backing but proof held them accountable.
And then they acted.
They didn’t argue.
They didn’t delay.
They took it down — and confirmed, in writing, that it was the legal action that triggered their response.
⚠️ If Their Story Was True — Why Did One Filing Scare a Company That Big?
That’s what no one is saying out loud.
Because if the claims were lawful,
If the material had merit,
If the version of events they published could withstand scrutiny…
Then why would one person — with no funding, no PR team, no media pull —
force one of the biggest tech companies on Earth to remove it?
They didn’t remove it because I was wrong.
They removed it because I was right —
and because the documentation made that impossible to ignore.
🔍 Who’s Next: Not Just Domains — But People
There are still independent domain hosts, private registrars, and mirror sites that continue to host or link to the very same defamatory content — even after this takedown occurred.
Let this be your notice:
You’ve been contacted. You’ve ignored removal notices. You’ve been provided with clear evidence that a major platform has already folded under pressure.
You’re not protecting free speech.
You’re protecting a falsehood that has already been proven harmful.
But this doesn’t end with hosts.
In the past few weeks, I’ve received screenshots from people who once believed the lie —
showing who reposted it.
Who shared it.
Who said nothing while it spread.
Who helped build the harm.
I’ve seen the names.
And those names are now recorded.
🗂️ The Takedown Wasn’t the Win — The Silence That Followed It Was
They removed the content.
Quickly. Quietly.
No explanation.
No defence.
Because once the pressure arrived, there was nothing left to say.
What does that tell you?
That the page shouldn’t have existed in the first place.
That the damage was real.
That when they finally looked at the evidence, they chose removal over responsibility.
And now the same evidence is going out again.
To domains.
To hosts.
And where necessary —
to the people who helped share it.
If the lie was strong enough to survive legal notice,
they would’ve defended it.
But they didn’t.
And that tells you everything you need to know.
One down.
The rest — documented.
— Calvin-Lee Hardie
Truth & Advocacy By Calvin-Lee Hardie - Inverness 